Stacking

Travelers Property Casualty Stacking of UM/UIM Coverages Arizona Class Action

This class action, against Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company, is about stacking uninsured and underinsured (UM/UIM) motor vehicle accident claims under Arizona law. The complaint alleges that Travelers was obliged to permit stacked UM/UIM coverage, because it did not do what it was required to do to avoid it.  Read more

Progressive Advanced “Stacked” UIM Coverage Pennsylvania Class Action

This class action brings suit against Progressive Advanced Insurance Company for charging customers for “stacked coverage” in households in Pennsylvania which have no other vehicles, and where stacking is therefore not possible.  Read more

Geico Advantage Premiums for Nonexistent Stacking Pennsylvania Class Action

This class action concerns auto insurance, specifically “stacked” uninsured/underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage with Geico Advantage Insurance Company. The complaint alleges that the insureds have been paying higher premiums for stacked coverage, even though they had only one insured vehicle each, so that no stacking was possible. The law governing the policies is Pennsylvania’s Motor Vehicle  Read more

Geico Casualty Nonexistent Stacking UIM Coverages Pennsylvania Class Action

Under some circumstances, it is possible to “stack” coverage under insurance policies relating to uninsured or underinsured motorist (UIM) coverages. This class action brings suit against Geico Casualty Company, alleging it charges customers higher premiums for stacked policies, even where there are no other vehicles in the household whose insurance could be stacked. This case  Read more