fbpx

Enfamil Number of Bottles of Formula Settlement

Settlement Structure: Claims Made

Active: Open

Case Summary:

Mead Johnson & Company, LLC will pay up to $8.4 million to settle a class action about certain of its Enfamil baby formula products. The complaint alleged that the products were deceptively labeled as making a certain number of bottles of formula when they cannot make that many when prepared according to the Instructions for Preparation & Use.

Docket Number:

22PH-CV00808

Company: Mead Johnson & Company, LLC

Filing Deadline: October 31, 2022

Class Period: January 1, 2017 to June 23, 2022

Objection Deadline: September 15, 2022

Exclusion Deadline: September 15, 2022

Final Approval Hearing: September 22, 2022

Proof of Purchase:

You do not have to provide proof, although you may be able to make a larger claim if you do.

Eligibility:

You may be eligible if you live in the US and you bought any of the Enfamil products at issue, for personal use, between January 1, 2017 and June 23, 2022. See the list of the products at issue at https://www.mjcservingsettlement.com/home/1548/DocumentHandler?docPath=/Documents/Enfamil_Product_List.pdf.

Typical Settlement Amount:

Benefits: Tier 1, without proof of purchase: Up to $3 per unit, up to a maximum of $15 per household. Tier 2, with proof of purchase: Up to $3 per unit, up to a maximum of $45 per household.

Total Settlement Amount: Maximum of $8,400,000

Class Representative Proposed Incentive Fee:

$15,000 in total

Law Firms:
KamberLaw LLC
Law Office of L. DeWayne Layfield, PLLC
Southern Atlantic Law Group PLLC

Claim Form: MJC Serving Settlement Claim Form

Case Name: Garrett Wacker, et al. v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC

Settlement Website: MJC Serving Settlement Website

Claims Administrator:
Kroll Settlement Administration, LLC

Claims Administrator Contact Information:

Wacker v. Mead Johnson & Company LLC
c/o Kroll Settlement Administration LLC
PO BOX 225391
New York, NY 10150-5391
info@mjcservingsettlement.com
833-512-2322

Tags: Deceptive Advertising, Deceptive Labels, Misrepresentation of Number of Servings