fbpx

Cascade Lacrosse Helmet Class Action Settlement

Settlement Structure: Claims Made

Active: Closed

Closed Settlement Statement:

According to court documents, the claim submission deadline has passed. Please contact the claims administrator if you have any questions.

Case Summary:

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit allege that Performance Lacrosse Group Inc. (“PLG”) misrepresented the compliance of the Cascade R lacrosse helmets with Standard ND-041, as established by the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (“NOCSAE”), and that Plaintiffs sustained economic damages as a result of purchasing Cascade R lacrosse helmets that were certified as NOCSAE-compliant but that allegedly did not comply with the NOCSAE standard. 

Docket Number:

3:14-cv-01842-WIG

Company: Performance Sports Group

Filing Deadline: December 31, 2016

Class Period: July 1, 2013 to November 20, 2014

Objection Deadline: September 16, 2016

Exclusion Deadline: September 16, 2016

Final Approval Hearing: October 19, 2016

Proof of Purchase:

Members of the Non-Retrofit class must provide their serial number and register for the retrofit program.

Eligibility:

The Settlement Class and two sub-classes have been defined as follows:

  • Class: All persons throughout the United States who purchased a new Cascade R lacrosse helmet between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014, and who did not resell it.
  • Retrofit Sub-Class: All persons throughout the United States who purchased a new Cascade R lacrosse helmet between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014, who did not resell it, and who have registered with PLG and had the retrofit performed by PLG pursuant to the R-M Retrofit Program as of the date of Final Approval of the Settlement.
  • Non-Retrofit Sub-Class: All persons throughout the United States who purchased a new Cascade R lacrosse helmet between July 1, 2013 and November 20, 2014, who did not resell it, and who have not had the retrofit performed by PLG pursuant to the R-M Retrofit Program as of the date of Final Approval of the Settlement. 
Typical Settlement Amount:

Non-Retrofit sub class will receive a $35 voucher, retrofit sub class will receive a $10 voucher.

Total Settlement Amount:

Class Representative Proposed Incentive Fee:

$1,500

Law Firms:
Chimicles & Tikellis
Denlea & Carton
McCune Wright Arevalo, LLP

Claim Form: Non-Retrofit Sub-Class Claim Form

Case Name: Lindsay Held and Matthew Hemberger, et al. v. Performance Lacrosse Group Inc.

Settlement Website: LINDSAY HELD AND MATTHEW HEMBERGER, ET AL. V. PERFORMANCE LACROSSE GROUP INC.

Claims Administrator:
Heffler Claims Group

Claims Administrator Contact Information:

Held v. PLG

c/o HEFFLER CLAIMS GROUP

P.O. BOX 58340

Philadelphia, PA 19102-8340 

Tags: Defective Product, Fitness Equipment and Products